Just what the title says. The review in question is here.Felt like it was relevant news after the big media circus around Citizen Kane losing the mantle a few weeks ago.Here's a snippet from the reviewI reviewed Paddington 2 negatively for BBC radio on release in 2017, and on multiple occasions after that, and I stand by every word of my criticism. This is not my Paddington Bear, but a sinister, malevolent imposter who should be shot into space, or nuked from space at the first opportunity. Over-confident, snide and sullen, this manky-looking bear bears little relation to the classic character, and viewers should be warned; this ain’t yo mamma’s Paddington bear, and it won’t be yours either. Maybe if you’ve never seen the tv show and don’t know any better, this’ll work, but long-term Paddington fans will find this too much to bear.Does this sound ridiculous to anyone else? I mean he's entitled to his opinion but it feels like a contrarian reaction with it being added just weeks after the aforementioned news. Thoughts? via /r/movies https://ift.tt/3fVRLSu
No comments:
Post a Comment